2011-08-30

mindstalk: (kirin)
I knew there were many language families, and many of their names indicate where they are, but I thought it'd be useful to associate them with famous languages (and with a large number of speakers) to stand as representatives, as well as targets for learning if you wanted to go look at exotic languages. So I went to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_language_families and clicked a lot.

Takeaway: you can't do this for all language families, because there are dozens of them -- heck, dozens in each of the Americas, New Guinea, and Australia alone. Not counting isolates, of which there are many. But, going by the big groups (at least 1% of world population, which is nearly 70 million people), we have, in order of native speakers:

Family (example languages, and notes) [% of world native speakers]

* Indo-European (duh) [46%]
* Sino-Tibetan (Chinese; Burmese, Tibetan) [21%]
* Niger-Congo (Yoruba, Zulu, Swahili) [6.4%]
* Afro-Asiatic/Hamito-Semitic (Arabic, Berber, Amharic, Hausa, Egyptian, Hebrew, Akkadian)
* Austronesian (Indonesian, Hawaiian; 9 of 10 branches only on homeland of Taiwan/Formosa; very diverse)
* Dravidian (Tamil; south India) [3.7%]
* Altaic (Turkic, Mongolian, maybe Korean and Japanese; disputed)
* Austro-Asiatic (Vietnamese, Khmer (Cambodia), Munda (indigenes of India))
* Tai-Kadai/Kradai (Thai, Lao; highly tonal) [1.3%]

some others of note:

Uralic (Finnish, Hungarian, Sami, Estonian)
South Caucasian/Kartvelian (Georgian)
Hmong-Mien (Hmong, which has 12 tones)
Iroquois (Cherokee)
Mayan
Uto-Aztecan (Nahuatl)
Quechua (Andes, Inca)
Eskimo-Aleut (Yupik, Inuit, Aleut)
Algic (Algonquian; Blackfoot, Cree, Massachusett, Mohican; has a couple in California)
Tupian (Brazil; Tupi, Guarani)
Khoisan (click; Khoi, San; no longer accepted as a single family)
Ainu
Sumerian (isolate)

But there are many many others. E.g. at least one non-Eskimo family that's in both Siberia and NW America, not to mention other Siberian and American families separately. Seven families indigenous to Mesoamerica, with Maya and Aztec representing only two of them. New Guinea's many, Australia's many...


There's also a concept of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sprachbund
unrelated languages in an area resembling each other through mutual exchange

blend of Romance, Slavic, etc. in Balkans (Albanian, Romanian, south Slavic, Greek, Romani)
Indo-Aryan/Dravidian
tonal and vowel sharing in SE Asia, Sino/Thai/Khmer
possibly the whole Altaic 'family'
clicks from Khoisan into Bantu/Nguni


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_family has a map and other discussion
mindstalk: (Enki)
On further thought, what really strikes me about that list is how many major Asian languages are in different families, on the level not of Latin and German but of Latin and Chinese. Mongolian: probable Altaic Chinese: Sino-Tibetan Korean and Japanese: likely isolates, possibly relatives of each other, or in Altaic Ainu: isolate Indonesia, Malay, Tagalog/Filipino, and Formosan languages: Austronesian Vietnamese and Cambodian: Austro-Asiatic Thai and Lao: Tai-Kadai Burma: Sino-Tibetan Hindi and Bengali: Indo-European Tamil: Dravidian and if you can find Asian Muslims who actually know Arabic: Afro-Asiatic 8 language families, not counting Ainu and Arabic, and with a maximal Altaic group; 10 with a smaller one. And of course this isn't counting all the minor families and isolates. Even when there's an ostensible or even real genetic relationship, moving from one country to the next is likely to seem completely different; Thai and Lao are close, as are Indonesian and Malay, but those aren't close to Formosan or Tagalog; Vietnamese and Khmer aren't close; no one can agree if Korean and Japanese are related to anything. Contrast with Europe, where it's Indo-European almost everywhere you go, with older branches like Celtic seeming indigenous to later ones like Latin/Romance and Germanic, having completely overwhelmed whatever came before Celtic, with only a few survivors like Uralic (Finnish, Hungarian) and the Basque isolate. Two families, plus one isolate. Three families if you push out to Georgia and Caucasian, though at that point you might as well add Turkish:Altaic as well. Of course, once again, we're talking about a much smaller population; Europe is basically half the population of north India. Then again, population size and language diversity don't have much to do with each other. Geography's probably more relevant, but obviously hasn't done that much in Europe. For whatever reason, Indo-Europeans were really good at invading Europe, in multiple waves, even.
mindstalk: (12KMap)
Which languages to learn to maximize the number of speakers is a traditional exercise, going something like English, Mandarin, Spanish, Russian, French, Arabic, Hindi, Swahili, Bengali, Portuguese, Japanese, German... But what if you wanted to learn one language per family, while maximizing speakers?

English, Mandarin, Swahili, Arabic, Indonesian, Tamil, Japanese, maybe Turkish, Vietnamese, Thai; possibly Korean; Hungarian. This can be seen as how to learn up to 12 useful languages while minimizing the possibility of any re-use to make your life easier. :)


Of course both lists can look different if weighted by one's personal probability of running into the language or speakers thereof.

Profile

mindstalk: (Default)
mindstalk

June 2025

S M T W T F S
123 45 67
89 10 1112 1314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Style Credit

Page generated 2025-06-18 07:07
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »