Active Entries
- 1: ebike under the rainbow
- 2: In which a dog attack gets me 40 dollars and maybe delayed trauma
- 3: Life by candle-light
- 4: some meal costs vs alternatives
- 5: stainless steel convert
- 6: One mask forward, two masks back
- 7: welp, SWG Discord
- 8: packing philosophy
- 9: overshoes followup
- 10: rain shoe covers
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
Style Credit
- Base style: Abstractia by
- Theme: White Lace by
no subject
Date: 2017-07-17 04:00 (UTC)From:A ban on 120 square foot apartments is not health or safety related, even if some people pretend it is. Lots of people live healthily in them elsewhere, while San Francisco invented minimum housing sizes as a racist weapon against Chinatown.
All of which is almost irrelevant when 330 square feet of parking space are required for every unit.
> what would likely amount to a Victorian penny hang with a few amenities.
I've actually *been* in a Tokyo microapartment.
> I know that a fair portion of the high cost is due to speculation and resale for profit
I don't know that. The role of outside capital seems massively overstated. Vacancy rates are very low. Housing growth has badly lagged job creation in all such cities; just today I was reading about 5000/year vs. 1000/year in Los Angeles. Houston alone has about as many housing starts as the state of California.
Housing is cheaper in much of the US, but not in the top job-creating and environmentally friendly cities. That's a costly disjunction.