mindstalk: (Default)
Dang, I stopped following my blogs RSS for not quite two months. Some partial catchup, in reverse temporal order:

structural unemployment bullshit
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/08/03/structural-humbug/
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/08/04/is-there-any-point-to-economic-analysis/
inflation hawk sexism, Yellen
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/29/the-she-devil-of-constitution-avenue/
Obama inflation hawk
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/29/fear-of-froth/
slow lane travel
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/28/life-in-the-slow-lane-trivial/
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/26/friday-night-music-sprawl-again/
centrism meaingless
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/26/things-fell-apart/
high inflation vanishing from the world
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/23/the-death-of-high-inflation/
urban sprawl, Atlanta vs. Boston
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/22/atl-v-bos/
urban sprawl and social mobility
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/22/did-sprawl-kill-horatio-alger/
urban sprawl, Pittsburgh, and Detroit
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/21/a-tale-of-two-rust-belt-cities/
America more homogenous, doing less shipping
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/15/america-is-flat/
France not collapsing
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/12/les-not-so-miserables/
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/13/more-on-not-so-miserable-france/
mindstalk: (Default)
Catching up on a lot of RSS reading...

A longish article on residential hotels, flophouses, and microapartments, and how American homelessness is rooted in the banning of cheap small places to live. Banning which in turn is rooted more in racism (anti-Chinese and other) than in true safety or welfare concerns. Or in classism, or false ideas about disease spread, or in ubiquitous parking requirements (a lot of these homes are *smaller* than the space needed to park a car.)
http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2013/07/sros_flophouses_microapartments_smart_cities_are_finally_allowing_the_right.html

More )

speaking of meritocracy and anti-Chinese racism, white Americans favor grade and test based college admission until told Asians do better under that
http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2013/08/13/white_people_s_meritocracy_hypocrisy.html
mindstalk: (Default)
Finnish maternity box all Finnish mothers can get http://updatednews.ca/2013/06/03/why-finnish-babies-moslty-sleep-in-cardboard-boxes/

Boston's role in gay liberation. First gay representative elected here. Origin of GLAD, but also NAMBLA. http://www.bostonglobe.com/ideas/2013/06/01/how-boston-powered-gay-rights-movement/wEsPZOdHhByHpjeXrJ6GbN/story.html

Yglesias on the space we lavish on inefficient cars http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2013/06/04/overallocation_of_urban_space_to_cars.html

inverse relation between trust and small business levels http://www.slate.com/articles/business/small_business/2012/07/the_small_business_problem_why_greece_italy_and_spain_have_too_many_small_firms_.html

Suicide by euro http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/03/the-triumph-of-peter-kenen-the-revenge-of-robert-mundell/
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/03/the-macroeconomics-of-european-disunion/

How Fox News controls its message http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/i_was_a_liberal_mole_at_fox_news_from_bill_oreilly_to_roger_ailes_heres_all_the_inside_dope/

carbon pricing around the world http://m.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/06/04/congress-hates-carbon-pricing-the-rest-of-the-world-doesnt/

economics of ticket scalping http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/09/magazine/the-secret-science-of-scalping-tickets.html?_r=0

Paleo diet/lifestyle myths http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/?p=3098 and http://discovermagazine.com/2013/april/17-paleomythic-how-people-really-lived-during-the-stone-age

How long each Doctor lasted http://www.wonderfulbook.co.uk/docdurations2.png
Moffat bingo http://www.impossiblepodcasts.com/2011/08/doctor-who-moffat-bingo-play-along-at.html

world improvement charts, with snark http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/05/24/these-31-charts-will-destroy-your-faith-in-humanity/

Partisans can be more accurate when paid to do so http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/06/03/if-you-pay-them-money-partisans-will-tell-you-the-truth/?wprss=rss_ezra-klein

Early Social Security not necessarily racist by intention http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/06/03/a-second-look-at-social-securitys-racist-origins/?wprss=rss_ezra-klein

Obamacare premium effects http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/06/03/the-six-ways-obamacare-changes-insurance-premiums/?wprss=rss_ezra-klein
mindstalk: (kirin)
Longish article in the Economist in the rapid fall of extreme poverty, from 1.9 billion in 1990 to 1.2 billion today, extreme being living on less than $1.25 a day.
http://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21578643-world-has-astonishing-chance-take-billion-people-out-extreme-poverty-2030-not

I just note that giving 1.2 billion people $1.25 a day would cost $547 billion a year. Not far off the cost of the US going to war. Compare to global GDP of $71,000 billion nominal, or $83,000 billion PPP. Less than 1% of world income. And giving poor people money seems to be really effective in helping them (shock! surprise!) as you're basically giving capital to the extremely capital-constrained.

http://chrisblattman.com/2013/05/23/dear-governments-want-to-help-the-poor-and-transform-your-economy-give-people-cash/
http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2013/05/unconditional_cash_transfers_giving_money_to_the_poor_may_be_the_best_tool.html
http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2012/08/23/eitc_works_higher_benefits_lead_to_better_outcomes_for_kids.html
http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2013/03/want_to_help_people_just_give.html

Links

2013-03-27 17:27
mindstalk: (Default)
I've been trying to reset my sleep schedule to something more in tune with society. So far I'm just massively jet lagged without the fun of having gone anywhere.

Snooze buttons are bad for you or at least can be, especially if you actually fall asleep you again; sleep has phases, and you can fall into a deeper phase than you were initially. This might also explain something I found during my orals prep: for two weeks my body refused to sleep more than 3 hours a night, and I was tired all the time, but trundled through my studied. The day of my exam I set my alarm, got woken up after three hours, and felt like nauseous crap. There's a difference between three hours because stupid body wakes up and three hours because alarm.

Another column on how teens naturally sleep at 11pm for 9 hours despite US insanity of having high schooler start earlier than elementary school.

***

NY Times takes on the Senate, the least democratic legislature in the developed world. 66:1 ratio in power between WY and CA. Why do the 500,000 people of Wyoming deserve more power (and federal money) than the 500,000 people of Fresno?

***

Cosmic ray bit flips a growing problem?

Cracked on gun myths or weird facts: gun ads are weird, there's no typical mass shooter, making suicide harder does work to reduce suicides, there's weird gun/god association, violence is down, guns get collected like expensive Barbie dolls, maybe all the gun porn and violent games reduce overall violence while increasing mass shootings. Maybe.

***

social mobility of food services, and contribution of liquor to urban vitality
http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2013/03/27/food_service_sector_should_be_taken_seriously.html
http://www.slate.com/articles/business/small_business/2013/03/liquor_license_moratoriums_nimby_idiots_are_strangling_great_neighborhoods.html

Las Vegas female bartenders. Another profession gets sexualized and off-limited for the non-young.
http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2013/03/las_vegas_bartender_went_from_a_male_to_a_female_job.html

***

Transit has big benefits. Even if a small %age of trips is via transit, those will be disproportionately trips that otherwise would have been on congested roads, so the benefit is larger than one might expect. I always said drivers should welcome transit subsidies as reducing the competition for road and parking...

Productivity minimum wage would be $22/hour. Inflation-linked would be over $10.50
mindstalk: (Default)
A little note on the rapid social progress of the US. E.g. back in the halcyon Reagan days, only a minority of Americans said they approved of interracial marriage. Something of a jump during the Clinton years, then another rise with Obama... do Democratic presidencies make poll responses more liberal?
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/22/seneca-salem-and-stonewall/

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/20/obama-and-redistribution/

Just as I was sympathetic to The Spirit Level, but not entirely convinced, so Krugman, though concerned about inequality, can't agree with Stiglitz that it's directly crippling recovery.
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/20/inequality-and-recovery/
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/21/more-on-inequality/

links

2013-01-21 12:59
mindstalk: (kirin)
Annals of a banana republic:
Texas under Perry:cut school budgets, give corporate welfare, get campaign donations
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/03/us/winners-and-losers-in-texas.html?hp&_r=1&
bright note: Daimler says it avoids incentives out of school budgets
"our workers send their kids there"


Cambodia propaganda state via karaoke and comedians. Sounds like something out of Transhuman Space Broken Dreams
http://latitude.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/18/song-and-dance-hun-sens-other-power-play/?hp

MLK day poem
http://squid314.livejournal.com/353114.html

what's good for American Airline isn't good for their execs
http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2013/01/18/amr_corp_s_creditors_should_listen_to_the_airline_s_unions.html

government can't save
http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2013/01/17/government_can_t_really_save_it_can_only_invest.html


Several from the Economist:

Indian genes in Australia; stone tool upgrade
http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21569688-genetic-evidence-suggests-four-millennia-ago-group-adventurous-indians?fsrc=rss|sct

soot pollution worse than thought
http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21569686-soot-even-worse-climate-was-previously-thought-new-black

American embassy reported on Beijing pollution
http://www.economist.com/news/china/21569743-measures-air-pollution-go-scale-public-impatience-rises-something-air

Austrialia had 40 degree national average temperature , high of 50
http://www.economist.com/news/asia/21569440-uncomfortable-time-australians-especially-climate-change-sceptics-up-eleven

global warming governance: geonengineering, migration
http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2012/12/anthropocene

safe asset shortage
http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2012/12/finance

China nuclear power
http://www.economist.com/news/china/21569774-china-wants-more-nuclear-plants-anyone-else-will-it-build-them-safely-back-front

four winged protobird
http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21565922-why-microraptor-became-extinct-four-wings-good-two-wings-better
mindstalk: (Default)
http://www.businessinsider.com/imf-admitted-their-economists-were-wrong-2013-1
based on http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2013/wp1301.pdf

The column is somewhat schizoid; about 45% of the way in, the author mentions Republican suppression of a similar but more narrow US report by the CRS, and then spends the entire rest of the column ranting about that. Kind of relevant but I wanted to hear more about the IMF. Basically it switches gears from "progress of economics" to "suppression of science".
mindstalk: (Default)
http://www.indexmundi.com/g/g.aspx?c=cu&v=67
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:GDP-Caribbean.png (my friends say that's 1990 PPP dollars)

GDP/capita PPP
Country 1999 2000 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Cuba 1,700 1,700 2,300 2,900 3,000 3,500 4,000 11,000 9,500 9,700 9,900

Tripling in one year? WTF. Some change in calculation? And I can't find anyone talking about it. GDP/capita nominal is $5000 now, up from $2500 earlier in the 2000s, or so says my memory though I'm not sure what source I used.
mindstalk: (Default)
Paul Ryan lies. He used government money to try to save a plant which closed anyway in 2008 before Obama took office -- and now he's blaming Obama for not saving it.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/08/17/paul-ryan-used-government-funds-and-power-to-try-and-save-gm-plant-in-his-district.html
Saletan turns on Ryan, admits being snookered
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/29/the-snooker-factor/

King of Denmark star of david story false
http://www.snopes.com/history/govern/denmark.asp

GOP RNC falsehoods
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/29/unconventional/

weird ape mask gif
http://i.imgur.com/Jz2Iu.gif
world atheism on the rise; Irish religiosity falls
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/08/religiosity-plummets-ireland-declines-worldwide-atheism_n_1757453.html

DC gentrification; long term devastation of 1968 riots
http://www.theatlanticcities.com/politics/2012/08/facts-and-fictions-gentrification-dc/2914/

Krugman defines neo-classical economics
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/28/neo-fights-slightly-wonkish-and-vague/

Boehner hopes blacks and Latinos don't vote
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2012/08/boehner-says-out-loud-he-hopes-blacks-and-latinos-wont-show-election/56245/

what drought will mean for food prices
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/wp/2012/08/27/why-the-u-s-drought-is-mainly-a-problem-for-poorer-countries/

Breivik Norway restorative justice
http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/08/a-different-justice-why-anders-breivik-only-got-21-years-for-killing-77-people/261532/
Saudi terrorist rehab
http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2009/10/applying-saudi-counterterrorism-to-the-afghanistan-war/28524/
mindstalk: (lizsword)
By Donald Shoup. I haven't read it, but I've seen some reviews:

High Cost of Free Parking reviews
parking subsidy
http://www.examiner.com/review/the-high-cost-of-free-parking-book-review
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/15/business/economy/15view.html

"For instance, after including construction and land costs, he measures
the value of a Los Angeles parking space at over $31,000"
"Yet 99 percent of all automobile trips in the United States end in a
free parking space, rather than a parking space with a market price. In
his book, Professor Shoup estimated that the value of the free-parking
subsidy to cars was at least $127 billion in 2002, and possibly much
more. "

And this one is a 2005 essay by Shoup himself:

http://www.sfgate.com/opinion/openforum/article/The-high-cost-of-free-parking-2630493.php

"Paving an entire state for a parking lot sounds outrageous. But because
there are at least three parking spaces for each of the 230 million
vehicles in the United States, the total space devoted to parking in
America amounts to an area about the size of Connecticut. "

"Studies of cruising in downtowns have found that up to 74 percent of
traffic was searching for parking, and the average time to find a curb
space ranged up to 14 minutes. "

"Most cities require commercial buildings to provide a parking lot
larger than the floor area, and for restaurants the parking lots are
often at least three times the size of the dining area. "
mindstalk: (Default)
transit blogs
http://pedestrianobservations.wordpress.com/
http://www.humantransit.org/

econ blogs
http://noahpinionblog.blogspot.com/
http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox.html -- Matt Yglesias. Someone suggested he was what I was looking for, in terms of economically-informed, market-friendly but not -fellating, liberals. Someone was right!

"Dr Laura Agustín on Migration, Trafficking and Sex"
http://www.lauraagustin.com/

Decline of US "assault deaths" and comparison to other countries, don't know how homicides are different. http://crookedtimber.org/2012/07/20/america-is-a-violent-country/ The curve seems overly smoothed IMO, wiping out a 1990s peak, though this doesn't change the long trend.

Map of causes of death http://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/usa/top-15-causes-of-death
The "accidents" map is particularly interesting.

Tokyo as "libertarian" society, without much commons http://noahpinionblog.blogspot.com/2011/08/do-property-rights-increase-freedom.html

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/07/big-campaign-spending-government-by-the-1/259599/
A tiny number of Americans -- .26 percent -- give more than $200 to a
congressional campaign. .05 percent give the maximum amount to any
congressional candidate. .01 percent give more than $10,000 in any
election cycle. And .000063 percent -- 196 Americans -- have given more
than 80 percent of the super-PAC money spent in the presidential
elections so far.

The "ultra-rich" of 1955
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/07/21/job-creators-of-1955/

LA takes lead in transit attitudes http://www.capitalnewyork.com/article/politics/2012/07/6192057/what-new-york-city-can-learn-los-angeles-about-transit-biz?politics-bucket-headline

Oprah visits India
http://www.firstpost.com/bollywood/you-still-eat-with-your-hands-oprahs-magical-mystery-tour-of-india-385494.html
mindstalk: (Default)
The European Union is famous. But there's also an African Union and the Union of South American Nations, or USAN. Neither is nearly as well developed as the EU and USAN in particular is very new, but out of all the other intergovernmental bodies and agreements out there, these seem closest to the EU in intent. Lots of people are skeptical of a world government, others hope for it out of the UN; me, I'd put my money on this sort of gradual and voluntary union. Imagine a world where all three unions are up and running, and where the economic gap has shrunk massively. Might not the same logic that formed the unions suggest that they in turn break down the barriers between them?

(And of course there's environmental issues, and the possibility of using sanctions on non-compliant countries.)

Part of me thinks that the AU is getting well ahead of itself; talk of a continent-wide parliament seems odd when most of the component countries can't run themselves well. But the AU has done some good with peacekeeper deployments and sanctioning a few cases of undemocratic or unconstitutional malfeasance, and I wonder if one bad government might not be better than a dozen. On the one hand, fewer places to run; on the other, fewer trade barriers and bigger risk pools and hopefully less war. And corruption can be either better or worse with scale.

Good Africa news, at least in military professionalism and cooperation.

Speaking of trade barriers, an interesting article on geography and develoment, particularly the costs of landlocked countries. A couple of money quotes:

"simply crossing the U.S.-Canadian border is equivalent to adding from 4,000 to 16,000 kilometers worth of transportation costs"

"Shipping a standard container from Baltimore to the Ivory Coast costs about $3,000, while sending that same container to the landlocked Central African Republic costs $13,000."

The cheapest trade is still maritime, so lacking coast means lack of direct access to cheap trade and having to go through neighbors who might tax or block you. Next cheapest trade is rail, but of course that's somewhat expensive infrastructure, problematic for a poor country to build or run, and you've still got the neighbors problem. The real fun poverty trap is a combination: landlocked, far from the cost with poor rail or roads, beset by tropical diseases, and being of small size and thus of limited risk sharing, so a natural disaster devastates the whole country. (Imagine if Colorado or Florida were independent countries, facing the fires and hurricanes that they do without federal aid.) Africa has 15 landlocked countries, mostly well away from coasts, with poor infrastructure and good diseases.

I feel sorry for Ethiopia, which became landlocked when Eritrea split away. The barrier's very thin for a good stretch, but presumably the countries aren't friendly.

Plus of course poverty means not being a market for research into your problems, disease or otherwise.

The Bottom Billion reportedly notes another problem: a small country with bad government and cheap labor isn't attractive to investors despite the cheap labor, because there's limited return on investing in figuring out how to deal with the bad government. Far better to go for China or India, where there's the promise of big labor pools and and maybe markets.
mindstalk: (Default)
So, the top lesson I got out of the Small Change book is how unstable and fluid money has been over time. Like, I get the impression that if money is stable over 30 years it's doing well. Or 60, anyway. An exaggeration? Maybe, but not a huge one. History seems full of shortage of small change, debasements, recoinages, shifts in silver and gold values and use, experiments with copper tokens, siege moneys of leather or other material, private tokens... plus of course a diversity of minted coins from lots of little kingdoms, and physical diversity even within a denomination due to wear and tear on coins. (So a coin might be 10% or more underweight, just from abrasion over 30 years. That's a lot of lost silver.)

Insert coin to read more )

The Conclusion?

Given how much things have changed, I suppose we could be a bit more humble, rather than assuming the current regime is the apotheosis of financial economics. ('We' = economists or lay followers, who assume floating exchange rates are great and gold standard advocacy a sign of crazy.) Maybe capital controls will become the next big thing. Maybe quantum computers and high end replicators will shred both electronic banking (due to cracking encryption) and paper money (easy counterfeiting) and we'll have to go back to commodity coins. Maybe central banks will have their independence revoked due to insufficient attention to full employment.

OTOH, there have been advances in theory, about the nature and effect of money; we live in the century of Keynes, Friedman, and Mundell, themselves standing on centuries of painfully learned lessons (still being learned.) And, there's a weak direction in history: token or fiat money keeps coming up again and again, not just due to sovereign greed but often due to a need for 'money' of whatever kind... even stamped leather strips. If you can prevent counterfeiting and keeping from overprinting, it works great. Well, until your central banks become so allergic to overprinting that they refuse to print enough, as in Japan, the EU, and US...
mindstalk: (Default)
I kind of think we need better labels to distinguish between moderate libertarians, (e.g. your average Keynesian economist, who, compared to the political norm, would tend to push policies favoring individual freedom and choice and tearing down unwarranted regulation or subsidies, without being allergic to the idea of useful regulation and provision of public goods), and night-watchmen and even more radical libertarians. Some way to say "I care about abolishing limited taxi medallions and hairdresser licenses and stupid (most) zoning" without implying "I want to abolish welfare and go on the gold standard and I think global warming is a hoax".

Alternately I'd be happy with some way of saying "liberal or social democrat who's more hip to economics and reasonably market and choice friendly", which would *also* describe the average Keynesian economist.

I guess most of my readership isn't particularly hip to economics so I should spell things out. Philosophically, being friendly to externality (free rider and public goods) justifications for government actions, while also being friendly to public choice theory warnings about democratic government (domination by special interests, regulatory capture -- really, it's the insight that democratic participation is itself subject to free rider and public goods problems.)

Policy-wise, being skeptical of rent control, zoning, most occupational licensing and even minimum wage, while supporting minimum income or guaranteed employment, certification, and pollution taxes or congestion charges. Instead of "you can't do X on your property", "you can do whatever as long as it doesn't bug the neighbors." Instead of "you must use efficient toilets and lightbulbs", charging appropriately for water and (CO2 generating) power use.

There's no Economist Party. The Democrats are too quick to leap to protectionism or specific regulation, the Republicans too plutocratic, the Libertarians too blind to market failure.

ETA: I'm reminded that with the space of a possible Economist Party, I'd still be way to the left, supporting regular job programs and free college and public art in public spaces and buildings, and strong progressive income and estate tax on top of land tax. Vs. the guy who supports job programs only in liquidity traps (like, now) and vouchers up to high school and screw the art and try to function only on land value and resource tax. But we'd both support universal health care and low barriers to market entry. Social Economist vs., I dunno.

The fun bit is that libertarian maestro Hayek has his social side, with text support social insurance and even back income. For that matter, even Rothbard granted that someone, somewhere -- maybe Latin America -- could use some redistributive land reform. Their followers tend to ignore these bits.
mindstalk: (Default)
I saw this book (or books, volumes on micro and macro) in the bookstore, and decided to check it out (literally; go library! Though I had to be tricky and lucky with call number to find the second volume, which wasn't coming on a simple title search). For me it was mostly light entertainment; I already knew most of the material, though I did get a couple things out of it. And if you've ever taken a good introductory class in micro and macro, from a teacher not biased too far to the right, it probably taught you a lot more. But if you want to learn or go over the basic concepts in a light fashion, I can recommend these books, both in material and position. It's what I think of as mainstream economics, meaning *not* conservative/libertarian laissez faire but enlightened mixed economies, both market friendly and open to market failures.

The order of content might be unusual; both books build up from simple cases. The micro book starts with the assumption of optimizing individuals, and talks about the decision theory of one individual, then game theory and the interaction of a small number of individuals, and only then about markets and the ideal interaction of $BIGNUM individuals. And it quickly sets up the big question: "Under what circumstances does individual optimization lead to outcomes that are good for the group as a whole?" And it talks about the benefits of trade and comparative advantage and how supply and demand curves work, but also the pitfalls of adverse selection, the prisoners dilemma, asymmetric information. It notes the limitations of economic Pareto efficiency, being necessary but far from sufficient for good outcomes. Competitive markets are awesome, but markets aren't always competitive. How taxes end up getting distributed among buyers and sellers (it largely doesn't matter who you put a sales or payroll tax on; elasticity will pass the burden around.)

Things I learned about:
* Hotelling's Law and why businesses often cluster, like hot dog stands in the middle of a beach rather than spaced out. The book actually just mentioned it in passing, leaving me to think about it then look it up.
* How driving can be a prisoner's dilemma. I sort of knew this, but gained new clarity. Given traffic mixed between cars and buses (or streetcars), driving will always be a dominant strategy as far as speed goes, always faster than the buses. But if everyone drives, you get rush hour congestion. So cars can invade a high quality bus or streetcar system due to individual preferences yet still lead to a worse outcome arguably worth suppression.
* Auction types and how they're equivalent. Ascending auctions and sealed-bid 2nd price auctions both encourage one to bid one's true value, but will lead to the winner paying only as much as the second highest bid; descending auction and sealed-bid 1st price auctions lead to the top bid being paid, but also to that bid being lower than the winner's true value. Which to run? For the auctioneer it often doesn't matter, but I'd guess the first is psychologically less annoying for the bidders.

The second book also builds up. One country, two trading countries, the world. Here, there are two big goals: to explain how economies grow, and why they collapse, with the holy grail of sustained growth without crashing. Again, it's mainstream (or mid-century mainstream, anyway), combining classical views over the long term (creative destruction! trade is just like advancing technology! jobs get made despite massive changes in the labor force!) with Keynesian views over the short term (trade and tech make winners and losers! high unemployment can be sustained for silly and fixable reasons!) It also goes over basics like trade (again), GDP, role of government, money (and currency unions), financial system instability.

It's been noted, perhaps by both Krugman and Mankiw, that the issues where just about all economists agree are often the ones on which they're least listened to. Invoking a favored economist in a political fight? Cool. Listening to a consensus against rent control, minimum wage laws (as opposed to other means of helping the poor), and trade barriers? Uncool. The chapter on sustainability is blase about copper (prices go up, new sources or new substitutes get found, markets are good at this) but alarmed about global warming (seriously guys, market failure, like overfishing!) with a typical economist answer of a carbon tax (help the market do its job properly.)
mindstalk: (atheist)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Workers%27_Day

Billy Bragg's Internationale: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zk69e1Vcmvg

Productivity growth and wage stagnation http://www.epi.org/publication/ib330-productivity-vs-compensation/

[ "the government of Prime Minister John Sparrow David Thompson declared in 1894 the first Monday in September as Canada's official Labour Day." After Cleveland in 1887 for the US. *cough cough* independent country ]
mindstalk: (angry sky)
I used to think that the deregulation of the US airlines was one of the successes of deregulation, cutting service quality but at least getting prices down. Looks like I was wrong! It's failing at that and killing cities too.

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/magazine/march_april_2012/features/terminal_sickness035756.php

Longish article. The industry has had trouble staying profitable. Services are being cut to bigger and bigger cities, like Cincinnati, St. Louis, and Pittsburgh, and where they aren't fares are monopolistic and high.

At first, the program—which was, naturally, embraced by many free market economists and the incoming Reagan administration—seemed to pay off. To be sure, many communities instantly lost air service, and the industry rapidly restructured into the hub-and-spoke system that still exists today, leading to the elimination of many direct flights. But the early years of the new regime also saw a burst of competition and price cutting in the airline industry.

What both policymakers and the public generally missed, however, was that any positive effects that occurred would be temporary, and that many of them would have occurred without deregulation. The price of energy, for example, cratered in the mid-1980s, making it possible to cut fares and even expand service on many short hauls. But that wasn’t an effect of deregulation; it was the result of a temporary world oil glut. Indeed, after adjusting for changes in energy prices, a 1990 study by the Economic Policy Institute concluded that airline fares fell more rapidly in the ten years before 1978 than they did during the subsequent decade.


Except for a period after 9/11, when airlines deeply discounted fares to attract panicked customers, real air prices have fallen more slowly since the elimination of the CAB than before. This contrast becomes even starker if one considers the continuous decline in service quality, with more overbooked planes flying to fewer places, long waits in hub airports, the lost ability to make last-minute changes in itineraries without paying exorbitant fares, and the slow strangulation of heartland cities that don’t happen to be hubs.


Despite the lack of explicit roads or railroads, the high costs of getting a plane into the air, and of running airports and traffic control, make flight a natural network monopoly like other forms of transportation and utilities, one which left to its own devices will shed marginal communities until it's restricted to the most profitable runs between giant cities.

It has amused me to realize that many libertarians probably picture a Jeffersonian yeoman idyll but their policies would actually lead to teeming megacities and wealthy estates. Perhaps they envision being on the estates.
mindstalk: (robot)
So, say you acknowledge that the lifestyle Western culture pushes you toward involves a lot of life at the expense of other people, from environmental damage to benefiting indirectly from land theft and labor exploitation to I'm sure other things as well, and you'd like to do something about it. But you're not going to walk away from Omelas, with or without the ForsakenChild on your back, because you're not a saint, or because you've done the math and think living like a hermit isn't wide-scale sustainable either. So what can you do?

Donations get mentioned, but I think one thing would be to scale your donations directly to your harmful activities. In an ideal society we'd have taxes on fossil carbon, congestion, and other externalities, privatising such costs. In our society you'll have to do it on your own. Like, say, you estimate the social cost of driving is about $2.50 per gallon. Then for every gallon you buy, you could donate that much to carbon offsets or some environmental or helping developing nations charity. Though really it can be anything altruistic, since the main thing is to raise your own awareness and effective price.

If you live in one of the many countries where the gas tax is already more than that, you could defensibly skip this, even though the tax is mostly going to your country's general revenues; your gas price is already higher than it would in an ideal society with externality-taxed gasoline and income tax-funded government.

But of course there's also the natural gas for heating, and coal/gas fueled electricity, to be price offset.

And then other goods. Sometimes there's a fair trade, or organic, or "not made in China", or sustainably harvested option to go with, at a higher price of course. Sometimes there isn't, but you can still apply the principle. Research or guess what you should be paying, and donate that. Again, the difference from charity as usual is that you not just giving "what you can give", you're deliberately offsetting or pricing higher your own side effect-laded behavior.

Do I do this? No, I just thought of it today. Will I? We'll see.

Thoughts?

Profile

mindstalk: (Default)
mindstalk

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11 121314151617
1819202122 23 24
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Page generated 2025-06-02 11:43
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »